Austin Health Case Study:
“In a bigger organisation the copy charge makes a huge difference to running costs. When you look at an organisation the size or ours, where you have 150 MFDs, using about 100,000 sheets of paper a week over 52 weeks in the year, that’s a lot of copy charges. By choosing Kyocera we were able to cut our copy cost by about 25%, so that’s a really significant difference“, said Tom

SWARH Rural Health Case Study:
On remote monitoring, O’Malley says, “Other firms competing for our business had an online monitoring service but Kyocera’s was the best we’d seen. Kyocera monitor the network for us and advise when consumables are needed, when service is required and when and where there’s a paper jam for instance. They do all of this on line which is crucial to servicing remote users.

Health Sector Case Study:
Our vendor of choice used to be Hewlett Packard but we switched to Kyocera in 2001 as they came out as the clear winner on total cost of ownership and we’ve continued to buy them ever since. They were ahead of all the competition.

Harmony Case Study:
It was not just for commercial reasons that Gary Houston, chief information officer for ARW, thought the Kyocera brand would be a good idea. “The number one reason for purchasing Kyocera was the environmentally friendly nature of their machines.”